Legal Opinion
Adams v. Burlington Northern Railroad
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 13, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-2051-GTVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, District Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion for certification of interlocutory appeal and for a stay of the district court proceedings pending such appeal (Doc. 44). For the reasons discussed in this Memorandum and Order, the motion is denied.
I. Background
This is an action brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., by several employees of defendant Burlington Northern Railroad Company. The plaintiffs allege that their positions were abolished and that their employer then assigned their duties…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dorato ex rel. Wrongful Death Claim of Tillison v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Randolph v. Cooper IndustriesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Blistein v. St. John's CollegeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994
- Knox v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1995
- Bintner v. Burlington Northern, Inc.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.