Legal Opinion

Wester v. Hedberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 7, 1897No. Nos. 10,589—(129)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Nobles county, P. E. Brown, J., denying a new trial after a verdict for plaintiff for $423.78.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

This is an action for the recovery of $400 claimed by the plaintiff to be due to him from the defendants as a balance of the purchase price of certain land sold by them as his agents. Verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendants appealed from an order denying their motion for a new trial. There are but three assignments of error meriting consideration. They are (a) that the verdict is not justified by the evidence; (b) that such misconduct of the jury was shown as to entitle the defendants to a new trial; (c) that they are also entitled to a new trial on the ground of accident and surprise.

1.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Bayard v. KlingeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  3. State v. LentzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Bradt v. RommelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GavleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Village of Pillager v. HewettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Hurlburt v. LeachmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. State v. HookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API