Legal Opinion
State v. Hook
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 15, 1929No. 27,271PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Convicted of the crime of carnal knowledge, defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
A former jury returned a verdict of guilty. This court granted a new trial. State v. Hook, 174 Minn. 590, 219 N. W. 926. On the merits the contention is that the evidence does not prove defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecutrix, Avhose home was at Tyler, Minnesota, first met defendant during the last days of August or the first days of September, 1926. From then on for about a month and a half he took her nearly every Sunday evening to the dance paAdlion at Lake…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. DurnamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Keegan v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- State v. HookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Hurlburt v. LeachmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Stevens v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GavleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Collings v. Northwestern HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- State v. GearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- State v. CaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930