Legal Opinion

Williams v. American Nat. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1935No. 4 Div. 841PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The bill is-for interpleader.

Appellant’s motion to dismiss the petition and demurrers were overruled. These rulings are the insistences of error.

The bill alleges that the pplicy of insurance in question was originally payable to the wife of the insured, and after the death of that beneficiary was changed to appellant; that Flossie M. Moore has given -defendant appellee notice that she is claiming the proceeds of the policy; that the naming of appellant as beneficiary was procured by fraud; that she, by agreement with assured (he being unable), paid the premiums on the policy…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Finn v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Robertson Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Catts v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Mobile v. BurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Flowers v. FlowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API