Legal Opinion

Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Partridge

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 13, 1930No. 6 Div. 570PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Appellee sued on a policy of life insurance. Appellant’s complaint on this appeal is that it was not allowed to interplead. The insuperable objection to appellant’s interpleader was and is that the sum which appellant was willing to pay was not the sum which appellee claimed to be due on the policy of insurance. The complaint declared upon a policy of insurance for the sum of $1,000, with interest from the death of assured. The interpleader brought into court the sum of $664.55. The rule of the courts is that, in an action of interpleader, the amount due from the party interpleading cannot be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MaxeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1869
  2. Coleman v. ChambersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Johnson v. BlackmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. King v. Woodlawn Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. OdellNew York Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Finn v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. First Nat. Bank of Mobile v. BurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Holderfield v. DeenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Robertson Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Montgomery v. HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API