Cyran v. Cyran (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentKennedy, J.
{¶ 15} Today, the majority holds that the collateral-consequences exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply to appellate review of a finding of domestic violence contained within a civil protection order ("CPO") issued pursuant to R.C. 3113.31, after a full hearing, when the order expires during the pendency of the appeal. While collateral consequences, to save an appeal from mootness, may not be speculative, see Pennsylvania v. Mimms , 434 U.S. 106, 108, 98 S.Ct. 330, 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977), fn. 3, and must be more than a mere possibility, see Spencer v. Kemna , 523 U.S. 1, 14-16, 118…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. GolstonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.