Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bernotas

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1990No. 2579PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The issue in this case is whether the service of notice rule applicable to summary proceedings, Pa.R.Crim.P. 80, or the general criminal service of notice rule, Pa.R.Crim.P. 9023, is applicable where the appellant appeals to the court of common pleas for a trial de novo from an adverse order before a district justice.

We hold that the applicable rule is the general criminal service rule. We therefore reverse the trial court which found that appellant was properly served where service was effectuated in accordance with the summary proceeding service rule.

On March 15, 1988, appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. PringleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. Blosenski Disposal ServiceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Constantino v. Forest Hills BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PantoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Capital Tax Collection Bureau v. Harden, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API