Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hollingsworth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*174. OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This case presents a very narrow issue: Whether one appealing a summary conviction from the Court of Common Pleas to the Superior Court must file post verdict motions. See, Pa.R.Cr.P. 1123. We conclude that the motions must be filed to perfect an appeal of a summary conviction initially tried in the Court of Common Pleas, however, for the reasons that follow, we reverse.

On December 15, 1983, a private criminal complaint was filed against Appellant by the School District of Philadelphia (hereinafter “District”) alleging that…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ViglioneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. YetsickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. McCrossonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Dickerson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. BernotasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API