Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pringle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 3, 1982No. 1968PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

The Appellant, Paula Pringle, files this direct appeal to our Court following her conviction after a non-jury trial, the denial of post-trial motions, and her sentencing on a charge of disorderly conduct. The episode which led to these charges, which will be more fully discussed below, involved the Appellant’s conduct in protesting a friend’s arrest by repeatedly shouting crude epithets at the arresting officers as a large crowd gathered at the scene of the arrest.

On this appeal, she contends that the provisions of the disorderly conduct statute under which she was convicted…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ReavesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. State v. ReadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  3. Russoli v. Salisbury TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. RagoliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. BrynerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API