Legal Opinion
Allen v. Pierce
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 21, 1982No. 81-1591PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants, four low-income individuals, sued the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (“Secretary”) and four federally subsidized housing projects in central Texas. Suit against the housing projects was later dismissed by agreement. The gravamen of appellants’ suit is to compel the Secretary to implement either a rent supplement program, 12 U.S.C. § 1701s,1 or another low-income tenant subsidy2 pro*595gram at three Section 236 3 and one Section 221(d)(3)4 housing projects in central Texas, Appellants contend that they would qualify for rent supplements if they were tenants of the housing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rubylee Davis, in No. 73-1249. v. George W. Romney, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in No. 73-1420Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Bread Political Action Committee v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Andrus v. Charlestone Stone Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cail v. Service Motors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Rosie Quarles v. Fred St. Clair, Individually and as Commissioner of the Mississippi State Department of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- City of Houston v. Morgan Guaranty International Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- Lifgren v. YeutterDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991