Legal Opinion
Lifgren v. Yeutter
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 27, 1991No. Civ. 4-89-912PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment against the United States Secretary of Agriculture, the Acting Administrator of the Farmers Home Administration, the Minnesota State Director of the Farmers Home Administration, the District Director for the Farmers Home Administration (the “Federal Defendants”) and Paddington Investors (“Paddington”). Also before the court is Paddington’s motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint and for summary judgment against the Federal Defendants. Finally, the court will consider the Federal Defendants’…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- DBSI/TRI IV Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Parkridge Investors Ltd. Partnership v. Farmers Home AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Brenham Community Protective Ass'n v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1995
- Parkridge Investors Limited Partnership v. Farmers Home AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994