Legal Opinion
Gessler v. Erwin Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed May 1, 1923:
Jones, J.
We are satisfied that the finding of the trial court that the plaintiff used such diligence as was required by the contract up to the time of the notice of July 29, 1918, was abundantly supported by the evidence. We shall' not detail at any length the testimony upon which this finding was based. The testimony shows that soon after the execution of the contract the plaintiff began an extensive sj^stem of advertising in Europe, the Orient, and South American countries. He sent letters and circulars to between four and five hundred American…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. Allen & Wheeler Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
- Thomas G. Carroll & Son Co. v. McIlvaine & Baldwin, Inc.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Bill Kummer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Eggert v. KullmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Ryan v. NapierDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
- Moore v. HayterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Fort Howard Paper Co. v. Standard Havens, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.