Legal Opinion

Thomas G. Carroll & Son Co. v. McIlvaine & Baldwin, Inc.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided June 23, 1909PublishedCited by 21 opinions

In Equity. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, District Judge.

The complainant is a corporation which has succeeded to and now owns a business founded in Baltimore by one Carroll in 1870. The defendant is a corporation which has succeeded to and now owns a business founded by one McIlvaine in New York in 1865. Both businesses have been continuous, and that of the defendant has for many years been well and favorably known in New York City. The complainant’s business appears from the evidence to have been of smaller volume, but to have been well known in Baltimore.

The parties to this litigation and their predecessors have both, during…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Manufacturing Co. v. TrainerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Macmahan Pharmacal Co. v. Denver Chemical Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. Glen Cove Manuf'g Co. v. LudelingU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
  4. Ohio Baking Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  5. Tetlow v. TappanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. France Milling Co. v. Washburn-Crosby Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. Charles Broadway Rouss, Inc. v. Winchester Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  3. President Suspender Co. v. MacwilliamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  4. Andrew Jergens Co. v. Woodbury, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1921
  5. Rothman v. Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API