Legal Opinion
Fort Howard Paper Co. v. Standard Havens, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 14, 1988No. 85-C-1293PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WARREN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Fort Howard Paper Company (“Fort Howard”) bought an air pollution control device called a baghouse from defendant Standard Havens, Incorporated (“Standard Havens”). Pursuant to a 71-page written contract, Standard Havens designed, manufactured and installed the baghouse. The baghouse, however, did not work to the satisfaction of Fort Howard and on August 30, 1985, Fort Howard brought suit stating a cause of action in contract for breach of warranty. The case was tried to a jury during three weeks of September, 1987. On September 30, 1987, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Allied Chemical Corporation v. Jack MacKay D/B/A MacKay Farms Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Cecil Corley Motor Co., Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974
- Burrus v. Itek Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Southern Illinois Stone Company, a Corporation v. Universal Engineering Corporation, a Corporation, and MacHinery Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Pinto Trucking Service, Inc. v. Motor Dispatch, Inc., and Harry NewbergerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fort Howard Paper Company, Cross-Appellant v. Standard Havens, Inc. And Continental Casualty Company, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Hutchison v. Amateur Electronics Supply, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993