Legal Opinion

Smith v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 9, 1945No. 15161PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is conceded that, if the instrument in the form of a deed, executed on March 10, 1939, is a valid deed, and the reservation therein is an ordinary life-estate, the defendants would have no right under their lease from the life-tenant to cut and remove the timber in question, and that the court did not err in granting the interlocutory injunction. The decisive question upon which the entire case turns is the proper interpretation of the reservation clause contained in that instrument. That clause expressly states that the reservation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smaha v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Price v. GrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. Patellis v. TannerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Wynn v. WynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Sperber v. BalsterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  2. Gardner v. ThamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  3. Icard v. HarbuckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Harris v. NeelySupreme Court of Georgia · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API