Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Q Petroleum Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 8, 1988No. C0-87-1429PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff, appellant Michael Freeman, filed suit against the respondents, his former employer, Q Petroleum Corporation, and Randy Kinny. Freeman alleged that respondents coerced him into taking a polygraph test in violation of Minnesota Statutes Section 181.75, subdivision 1 (1986). Freeman seeks actual damages, costs, disbursements and fees in accordance with Section 181.75, subdivision 4. 1
The suit was filed more than two but less than six years after the alleged illegal acts. In their Amended Answer, respondents raised the statute of limitations as a defense.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ashland Oil Co. v. Union Oil Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
- Merchants' Nat. Bank v. Northwestern Mfg. & Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- STATE OF MINN. BY HUMPHREY v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1983
- State v. BonnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
3Cited by8 opinions
- McDaniel v. United Hardware Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Torrealba v. KesmetisNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Estate of Riedel Ex Rel. Mirick v. Life Care Retirement Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.