Legal Opinion

Frank v. Fischer

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 8, 1986No. 8131-8-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reed, A.C.J.

James V. Frank appeals a summary judg*135ment dismissing his lien foreclosure suit against Edward A. and Mildred M. Fischer, husband and wife.

The issue on appeal may be stated as: Can a homeowner with extensive past experience as a contractor, who employs members of more than one trade in the construction of his personal residence, and generally supervises the project, assert the bar to suit provision of RCW 18.27.080 against a claim of one of the contractors who did not register? We answer in the affirmative, and affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate only when there is no genuine…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ohler v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Lassila v. City of WenatcheeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Stewart v. HammondWashington Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frank v. FischerWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Rismon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. State v. DebaunDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API