Legal Opinion

Carrie Kramer and Julius Kramer, Executors of the Estate of Abraham Kramer, Deceased v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 14, 1969No. 285-66PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

NICHOLS, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Carrie and Julius Kramer, are executors of the estate of Abraham Kramer. They are claiming an estate tax refund because they say the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (hereinafter referred to as the Commissioner)' wrongfully included in the decedent’s gross estate the value of the right of decedent’s widow to receive weekly payments from his employer after his death. The parties have stipulated the facts. We agree with the plaintiffs.

In 1946, Abraham Kramer, the decedent, organized the Kramer Supply Company, a wholesale plumbing business. He originally owned…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Rothensies v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Fusz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
  4. Estate of J. William Bahen, Deceased, Kathleen Privett Bahen, Sole v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  5. Higgs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  2. Estate of Bogley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  3. Hegeman-Harris & Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  4. Wilmington Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Estate of Lumpkin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API