Legal Opinion
Smith v. Barr
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided July 26, 2007No. 4280PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Defaulting taxpayers brought an action to set aside a tax sale of real property, arguing Greenville County did not follow the statutory requirements. The Master-in-Equity (the Master) issued an order setting aside the tax sale. The purchaser of the property at the tax sale appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1999, Kent Smith and Dorothy Smith (collectively the Smiths) purchased real property (the Property) located in Greenville County, South Carolina. At the time of the purchase, the Smiths resided in Taylors, South Carolina. Subsequent to this purchase, the Smiths moved to a new residence.
Mr. Smith…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tiger, Inc. Ex Rel. Green Apple Partnership v. Fisher Agro, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Pike v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Godfrey v. HellerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Modern Homes Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
- Dearybury v. DearyburySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Regions Bank v. Wingard Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Morgan v. South Carolina Budget & Control BoardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- King v. JamesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- Forfeited Land Comm'n of Bamberg Cnty. v. BeardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Johnson v. LloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.