Legal Opinion

Joseph Seravalli, John Seravalli, Jr., and the Brookchester Corporation v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 4, 1988No. 87-1566PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal from the United States Claims Court, the United States challenges as excessive the damages awarded against it for breach of contract. The government’s principal contention is that the Claims Court used an impermissible method of calculating damages. The government also contends that in any.event the damages were excessive. We reject both of these contentions and therefore affirm.

I

In February 1984, the appellees, as high bidders, entered into a contract to purchase for $126,500 an apartment complex in New Haven, Connecticut, that the Department of Housing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. 564.54 Acres of Monroe and Pike County LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Commodities Trading Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. The Sill Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. Buena Vista Homes, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. City of Harlingen v. Estate of SharboneauTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Linda Vaizburd and Arkady Vaizburd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Barrett Refining Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Otay Mesa Property, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  5. Masayesva v. HaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API