Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Haagenson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1997No. 97-297PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

Sara and Benjamin Haagenson filed a petition in the District Court for the Fourth Judicial District in Missoula County in which they sought removal of Darla Zenker-Haagenson as personal representative, and for supervised administration of the Estate of David B. Haagenson. Following a hearing, the petition was denied. Sara and Benjamin appeal. We affirm the order of the District Court.

The issue on appeal is whether the District Court abused its discretion when it denied the appellants’ petition.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

David B. Haagenson and Kathy Finneman married in 1974. They had two children, Sara…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WeeksMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Loney v. Milodragovich, Dale & Dye, P.C.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Rasmussen v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Matter of Estate of PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Cenex v. Board of Com'rs for YellowstoneMontana Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of UnkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re the Estate of KuraltMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re the Estate of ZempelMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re the Estate of KuraltMontana Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API