Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Counts

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 8, 2015No. Appellate Case 2013-000086; 27546Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Pleicones

I concur in the majority’s decision to affirm petitioner’s conviction and sentence, but write separately as I do not believe that the privacy clause of S.C. Const, art. I, § 10 (2007) altered the common understanding that a law enforcement officer, like other individuals, has an “implicit license ... to approach the home by the front path, knock promptly, wait briefly to be received, and then (absent invitation to linger longer) leave.” Florida v. Jardines, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1409, 1415, 185 L.Ed.2d 495 (2013). An officer who does not have a warrant “may approach a home and knock precisely…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. State v. BashCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API