Legal Opinion

Rose v. Magro

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 24, 1929No. 6 Div. 468PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was civil action for homicide; the verdict was for defendant.

The plea of self-defense interposed was challenged on several grounds. Was it defective in the failure of averment of facts rather than the statements by way of conclusion? Vaughn v. Dwight Mfg. Co., 206 Ala. 552, 91 So. 77. It specifically averred that immediately before and at the time of the shooting of intestate by the defendant, the conduct of plaintiff’s intestate was such as to justify a reasonably prudent person, under like circumstances, in believing his life was in danger, or that he was about to suffer grievous…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Leith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. O'Hare v. Chicago, Madison & Northern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Florence Cotton & Iron Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Aaron v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Shelby County v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Alabama Clay Products Co. v. MathewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API