Legal Opinion

City of Toledo v. Custer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1970No. 69-718PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

Having resolved to appropriate for public purposes certain real estate owned by appellee, Custer, and being unable to agree with the owner upon the value thereof, the city of Toledo invoked the provisions of R. C. 163.01 et seq. (Uniform Eminent Domain Act) by filing a petition in the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas on June 8, 1967, alleging the value of the real estate to be $15,500 and praying “that upon filing of an answer herein the court fix a time for the assesment by a jury of the compensation to be paid.”

Summons was served upon appellee who makes no claim of lack of knowledge of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of Cincinnati v. Bossert Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Akron v. GayOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Cincinnati v. GlassmeyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Gregory v. Sterling CastingsOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. In re Appropriation of Easements for Highway PurposesOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Weir v. RimmelinOhio Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API