Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Richardson v. Suster

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2011No. 2011-0676PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Allen Richardson, for a writ of procedendo insofar as he sought to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Ronald Suster, to schedule a de novo sentencing hearing in his criminal case 1 to remedy errors in his original sentencing entry. Richardson claims that the entry did not properly impose postrelease control and did not comply with Crim.R. 32(C).

{¶ 2} Richardson’s sentencing entry “ ‘sufficiently included language that post-release control was part of his sentence so as to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ohio Contract Carriers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. Pruitt v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Alicea v. KrichbaumOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State ex rel. Tucker v. ForchioneOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State ex rel. Scheck v. CollierOhio Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ironics, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State ex rel. Mullins v. CurranOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
  4. State ex rel. Mullins v. CurranOhio Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API