Legal Opinion
Crandall v. Cain
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 21, 1956No. 5426PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By DEEDS, J.
The defendant-appellee, Clerk of the City of Columbus, presents her motion to dismiss the appeal perfected by plaintiff-appellant herein.
*135Plaintiff commenced the proceedings in the Court of Common Pleas as an action for an injunction in relation to proceedings for the annexation of certain territory to the City of Columbus, pursuant to §709.01, ef seq., R. C.
Sec. 709.07 R. C., provides as follows:
“Petition to enjoin the proceedings. If, within sixty days from the filing of the transcript, map or plat, and petition in his office as required by §709.03 R. C., the auditor or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Boise City Irr. & Land Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
- Trumbull County Board of Education v. State Ex Rel. Van WyeOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Lamneck v. CainOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Board of Trustees v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Branson v. Cain, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1956
- Anderson v. Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1962