Wolverine Oil Co. v. Kingsbury
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County ; Conn Linn, Judge. Action by J. R. Kingsbury against the Wolverine Oil Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.*
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER. C.
It is asserted that a reversal should be had for the following reasons:(a) That the evidence fails to show the relationship of master and servant between defendant in error and Wolverine Oil Company or its receivers.
Ob) No primary negligence upon the part of the company or its receivers is shown by the evidence.(c) The introduction of incompetent evidence upon behalf of defendant in error over the objection of the Wolverine Oil company and to which it at the time excepted.(d) The refusal of the court to give instruction No. 4 offered toy plaintiff in error.
The suit was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. BluntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Prickett v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Hardesty v. Largey Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1906
- Henley v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Lowe v. HickorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- City of Edmond v. WashamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Haynie v. HaynieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966