Legal Opinion

Sears v. Sears

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 16, 2005No. 01-2933; A117631PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

This case is before us on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, Sears v. Sears, 337 Or 555, 101 P3d 809 (2004), with instructions to reconsider it in light of the court’s decision in O’Donnell-Lamont and Lamont, 337 Or 86, 91 P3d 721 (2004). We previously determined that paternal grandparents had not rebutted the statutory presumption under ORS 109.119 1 that mother had acted in the best interests of her child (AM). We therefore reversed the trial court’s award of custody of AM to grandparents. Sears v. Sears, 190 Or App 483, 79 P3d 359 (2003). We now reexamine the record in light of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Marriage of O'Donnell-LamontOregon Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of DennisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Strome and StromeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Muhlheim v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API