Legal Opinion

Muhlheim v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2007No. 040204, 051267 A129926 (Control) A129927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

In these consolidated cases, father challenges the award of custody of his daughter, E, to her maternal aunt and uncle pursuant to the psychological parent statute, ORS 109.119. Father contends that the trial court erred in determining that aunt and uncle had established a “[c]hildparent” relationship with E, ORS 109.119(10)(a), and that aunt, and uncle had rebutted the statutory presumption of ORS 109.119(2)(a) that “the legal parent acts in the best interest of the child.” Father further contends that the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence and in considering issues not framed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re Marriage of O'Donnell-LamontOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Jordan v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Matter of Marriage of DennisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Venture Properties, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. In Re the Marriage of NguyenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API