Legal Opinion

Colley v. Sapp

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 18, 1922No. 10578PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITCHFORD, V. C. J.

The defendants in error, being attorneys-at-law, were employed by the plaintiff in error to bring an action in the Circuit Court of the' United States for the District of Kansas,' wherein the plaintiff in error, for himself, and also for himself as a stockholder in the New York Zinc Company, and all the stockholders whose situation in said corporation Was similar to that of himself, to have set aside and canceled certain mortgages, judgments, liens, etc., which Charles C. Wolcott and Francis E. Wolcott had and held against certain mining lands and property belonging to said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Colley v. SappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. North v. HookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Uncle Sam Oil Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Savage v. StokesIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Boulter v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Hughes v. Owl Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API