Legal Opinion

Heimann v. Roadway Express, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 8, 2002No. 99 C 6854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LEVIN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Scot L. Heimann (“Plaintiff’) seeks recovery in a Second Amended Complaint against Defendant Roadway Express, Inc. (“Roadway”) for unlawful discriminatory employment practices in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. and the Rehabilitation Act of 1978, 29 U.S.C. § 794. Before the Court are the parties cross-motions for summary judgment in the cause. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and denies Plaintiffs Counter…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goode v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  2. Cambio Health Solutions, LLC v. SloateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. Varga v. Clark Foodservice of IndianaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API