Heimann v. Roadway Express, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LEVIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Scot L. Heimann (“Plaintiff’) seeks recovery in a Second Amended Complaint against Defendant Roadway Express, Inc. (“Roadway”) for unlawful discriminatory employment practices in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. and the Rehabilitation Act of 1978, 29 U.S.C. § 794. Before the Court are the parties cross-motions for summary judgment in the cause. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and denies Plaintiffs Counter…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goode v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Cambio Health Solutions, LLC v. SloateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Varga v. Clark Foodservice of IndianaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2003