Legal Opinion

Roberson v. Provident House

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 11, 1991No. 90-C-1388PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

576 So.2d 992 (1991)

James ROBERSON

v.

PROVIDENT HOUSE.

No. 90-C-1388.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 11, 1991.

James Roberson, in pro. per.

Mack E. Barham, Robert E. Arceneaux, for James Roberson plaintiff-applicant.

C. William Bradley, Jr., Lemle, Kelleher, for Provident House, Gemar, Inc. and St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co., defendants-respondents.

HALL, Justice.

This suit is for damages that plaintiff, James Roberson, allegedly received from having an in-dwelling catheter inserted and then removed from his bladder while he was a patient at the Provident House nursing home. Plaintiff sued Gemar,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hondroulis v. SchuhmacherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Cox v. WM Heroman & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  3. Webster v. RushingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  4. Karl J. Pizzalotto, MD, Ltd. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  5. Austrum v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  2. Fitzgerald v. TuckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  3. Lugenbuhl v. DowlingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  4. Stockstill v. CF Industries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Riser v. AMERICAN MEDICAL INTERN., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API