Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 29, 1999No. 98-C-2313PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

737 So.2d 706 (1999)

Ann Lang FITZGERALD

v.

Thomas C. TUCKER, et ux.

No. 98-C-2313.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 29, 1999.

Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General, John Henderson Ayres, III, Counsel for Applicant.

Carl William Robicheaux, Lafayette, Counsel for respondent.

CALOGERO, Chief Justice.[*]

We granted a writ in this case to determine whether defendant is liable to plaintiff for defamation. After a thorough review of the record, we reverse the portion of the court of appeal's judgment affirming the district court's award of damages for defamation, because we find that statements made by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Mashburn v. CollinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  3. Cangelosi v. SCHWEGMANN BROS., ETC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  4. Sassone v. ElderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  5. Trentecosta v. BeckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. Costello v. HardySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  2. Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  3. Starr v. BoudreauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Thinkstream, Inc. v. RubinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API