Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
923 So.2d 627 (2006)
Peter T. LEMANN and Nancy Nafe Lemann
v.
ESSEN LANE DAIQUIRIS, INC., et al.
No. 2005-CC-1095.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
March 10, 2006.
Simoneaux, Carleton, Dunlap & Olinde, Henry D.H. Olinde, Jr., Scott E. Mercer, Baton Rouge, for Applicant.
The Law Offices of Arthur A. Lemann III, & Associates, Arthur A. Lemann, III, Arthur A. Lemann, IV, New Orleans; Atkinson, Perry, Atkinson & Balhoff, John W. Perry, Jr., Randi Ellis, Baton Rouge; Office of the Parish Attorney, James L. Hilburn, Randy B. Ligh, Baton Rouge, Freddie Paul, Pro se, for Respondent.
WEIMER, Justice.
We granted…
Also in this document: Dissent · Calogero; Dissent · Kimball.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Fowler v. RobertsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by276 opinions
- Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
- Audler v. CBC Innovis Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police JurySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Hanks v. Entergy Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- Board of Commissioners v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.