Legal Opinion
Troshinsky v. Rosin
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 13, 1981No. 79-887PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant filed a complaint in the trial court (1) to set aside a presently recorded deed which she claims fraudulently conveyed to appellees title to certain realty in the District of Columbia, and (2) to impress a trust on this particular realty in her favor for (a) the amount of her dower interest and (b) for the sum of $4,000 1 which she alleged she had paid to obtain an interest in such realty.
The court ruled that appellant was not entitled to a jury trial in light of the equitable relief sought in her suit and, after hearing appellant’s evidence at trial, dismissed her case pursuant to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Swofford v. B & W, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Bennett v. KigginsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- M. D. Rutledge v. Electric Hose & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- East v. EastDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. Wolensky's L.P. (In Re Wolensky's Ltd. Partnership)District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- District-Realty Title Ins. Corp. v. FormanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Jackson v. BowenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988