Legal Opinion

Rohda v. Boen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1954No. 32874PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is an action for a division of profits, or, in the alternative, for unpaid salary. The controversy arises out of the operations of Boen-Sealand Constructors, a joint venture comprising a partnership (Olav Boen Construction Company) and a corporation (Sealand Construction, Inc.). The partnership portion of the joint venture was composed of three men, each having an equal interest in the partnership. The corporation had three stockholders, each owning one third of the stock, and each being a director and an officer of the corporation. This suit was instituted by appellant Charles M. Rohda,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lambuth v. Stetson & Post, Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Graff v. GeiselWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Davidson v. MacKall-paine Veneer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Fisher v. HagstromWashington Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Richards v. KuppingerWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lasser v. Grunbaum Bros. Furniture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. O'BRIEN v. SchultzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Hughes v. StusserWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Hodges v. GronvoldWashington Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API