Thompson v. Commonwealth, Department of Highways
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Montgomery, J.,
This appeal requires an interpretation of Section 705, Art. VII, of the new Eminent Domain Code of 1964, Special Session, June 22, P. L. 84. The issue before us, as expressed by appellants, the property owners-condemnees, in their brief under Statement of Question Involved, is as follows: “1. May a valuation expert in an eminent domain case testify as to the dollar value of (a) land; (b) cost of adjustments; and (c) facts and data which he used in arriving at his opinion of the before and after values?”
The appellants were the owners of 76 acres, more or less, of land…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- McSorley v. Avalon Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Holton EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Baldwin v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Puloka v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kovach v. Gen. Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Morning Call, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Scavo v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- North Side Deposit Bank v. Urban Redevelopment Authority of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Fink v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.