Legal Opinion

Puloka v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1936No. Appeal, 178PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

In constructing a state highway in Delaware County, the Commonwealth appropriated 1.79 acres of plaintiff’s land. It is situate in the Township of Ridley and borders on a creek of that name. The tract contains twelve acres. The road as constructed divided the land into two parts, leaving the bam on one side of the highway and the house and outbuildings on the other. The grade of the highway necessitated cuts of a maximum depth of five feet eight inches and fills of the maximum height of 32 feet. The jury awarded plaintiff damages in the sum of $2,662.50.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Soldiers and Sailors Memorial BridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. McGarrity v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Herrington's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Regina v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Heil v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Johnson's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. McCrady CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Byers v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API