State v. Grubstake Inv. Ass'n
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GREENWOOD, J..The state of Texas, by the Attorney General, sued the Grubstake Investment Company and others to recover the title to, and possession of, a portion of the bed of the Erio river in the counties of McMullen and Live Oak. A. J. Coyle and the Coyle-Concord Oil Company, as holders of the state’s permit to prospect for oil and gas in the portion of the river bed sued for, adopted the state’s pleadings, becoming co-plaintiffs in the suit. The defendants pleaded a general denial and “not guilty,” besides asking special relief.
The facts disclosed, without dispute, that the coplaintiffs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mayor of Galveston v. MenardTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Mitchell v. BassTexas Supreme Court · 1862
- City of Austin v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Massachusetts v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Phillips v. AyresTexas Supreme Court · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of Texas v. BradfordTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- San Antonio River Authority v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Ahumada v. Dow Chemical Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- San Antonio River Authority v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1962