Legal Opinion

State v. Grubstake Inv. Ass'n

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1927No. 4428PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENWOOD, J..The state of Texas, by the Attorney General, sued the Grubstake Investment Company and others to recover the title to, and possession of, a portion of the bed of the Erio river in the counties of McMullen and Live Oak. A. J. Coyle and the Coyle-Concord Oil Company, as holders of the state’s permit to prospect for oil and gas in the portion of the river bed sued for, adopted the state’s pleadings, becoming co-plaintiffs in the suit. The defendants pleaded a general denial and “not guilty,” besides asking special relief.

The facts disclosed, without dispute, that the coplaintiffs…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mayor of Galveston v. MenardTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Mitchell v. BassTexas Supreme Court · 1862
  3. City of Austin v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Massachusetts v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Phillips v. AyresTexas Supreme Court · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Texas v. BradfordTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. San Antonio River Authority v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ahumada v. Dow Chemical Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  4. San Antonio River Authority v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API