Ahumada v. Dow Chemical Co.

Appellant’s Point of Error Number 2 complains that the trial court erred in granting Summary Judgment, because the *563Columbian constitutional rights of the plaintiff fishermen to earn a livelihood from subsistence/artisanal fishing and due process prevail over the enforcement of the alleged “fishing ban” .regulation against plaintiffs.

Under Columbian constitutional law, the fishermen have a right to subsistence and artisanal fishing to protect their lives and their families. Any incompatibility between any other law or juridic norm with such rights to fish shall be resolved in favor of such…