Legal Opinion
Lane v. Nading
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 20, 2019No. 18-2194; No. 18-2426PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOY, Circuit Judge.
*1021Arkansas state prisoner Adam Lane sued his former parole officer, Adam Nading, and a Fort Smith police officer, Joseph Boyd, (collectively, the "officers") under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for allegedly violating his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. He claimed that the officers failed to knock and announce their presence before entering his hotel room, seizing narcotics and a gun, and arresting him while he was on parole. The district court denied Nading's motion for judgment on the pleadings and Boyd's motion to dismiss on the grounds…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- District of Columbia v. WesbySupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Peter Clayton McClendon v. City of Columbia, City of Columbia James R. CarneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- David Ivey v. Audrain County, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Teresa Graham v. Shannon BarnetteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Ginger Elder v. Cindy GillespieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Florine Ching v. Ofc. Neal WalshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- Jody Lombardo v. City of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.