Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Luminar Technologies, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided September 10, 2025No. 6:23-cv-00982Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION JOHN ALMS, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:23-cv-982-JSS-LHP LUMINAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and MIKE MCAULIFFE, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiff’s third amended class action complaint with prejudice. (Dkts. 81, 87.) Plaintiff opposes the motion. (Dkt. 83.) Upon consideration, for the reasons outlined below, the motion is denied. BACKGROUND1 Defendant Luminar Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded company that develops technology used in autonomous vehicles, including…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API