Legal Opinion
Phoenix Technologies, Inc. v. TRW, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 14, 1994No. 92-CV-5863PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the motion of defendant, TRW, Inc., to file a second amended counterclaim against plaintiff, Phoenix Technologies, Inc., pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. *123Plaintiff opposes this motion for several reasons. First, plaintiff claims that there has been undue delay in filing the motion. Second, plaintiff claims that it will be prejudiced if the amendment is allowed. Third, plaintiff claims that the proposed amendment would be futile for several reasons. For the reasons set forth more fully below,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- J.E. Mamiye & Sons, Inc. v. The Fidelity Bank v. Commonwealth Marine and General Assurance Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Vanguard Telecommunications, Inc. v. Southern New England Telephone Company Csx Corporation, and LightnetCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Perfect Plastics Industries, Inc. v. Cars & Concepts, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Tarkett Inc. v. Congoleum Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Brown v. Woodmen Accident & Life Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Elf Atochem North America, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- McCarthy v. Komori America Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Phoenix Technologies, Inc. v. Trw, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994