McCarthy v. Komori America Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Complaint to Include a Count for Punitive Damages. In response to Plaintiffs’ Motion, Defendant argues that Plaintiffs unjustifiably delayed filing their Motion, that allowing amendment of the complaint at this late date would needlessly extend the discovery period, and that amendment would be prejudicial to Defendant. For the reasons that follow, we agree with Defendant and will deny Plaintiffs’ Motion.
Motions to amend pleadings are governed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a), which, except in some…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lorenz v. CSX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- J.E. Mamiye & Sons, Inc. v. The Fidelity Bank v. Commonwealth Marine and General Assurance Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Tarkett Inc. v. Congoleum Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Kuhn v. Philadelphia Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ALLIED RECYCLING, INC. v. COOK MARAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- Ania Evans v. Cumberland CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Granite State Insurance Company v. Star Mine Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020