Legal Opinion
Tarkett Inc. v. Congoleum Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 13, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 91-CV-4830PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBRENO, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant Congoleum Corporation has moved this court for leave to amend its answer to assert counterclaims for trade secret theft and antitrust violations (Document No. 60). For the reasons stated be*290low, I will permit defendant to amend its answer to add an antitrust count and will deny defendant’s request to add a count based upon alleged trade secret theft.
II. DISCUSSION
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) provides in relevant part that:
[a] party may amend the party’s pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Continental Can Company Usa, Inc. And Continental Pet Technologies, Inc. v. Monsanto Company, Hoover Universal, Inc. And Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Bechtel v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Berger v. Edgewater Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Russoli v. Salisbury TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Synthes, Inc. v. MarottaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Raines v. Haverford CollegeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Meyer v. Argent Mortgage Co. (In Re Meyer)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- United States v. 2001 Honda Accord EX VIN 1HGCG22561A035829District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.