Legal Opinion

Dixon v. City of Worland

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1979No. 4976Published

1Opinion of the Court

595 P.2d 84 (1979)

Jim Edward DIXON, Appellant (Defendant below),

v.

CITY OF WORLAND, a Municipal Corporation, Appellee (Plaintiff below).

No. 4976.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

May 17, 1979.

Jim E. Dixon, pro se.

Floyd D. Gorrell, Worland, for appellee.

Before RAPER, C.J., McCLINTOCK, THOMAS and ROSE, JJ., and GUTHRIE, J., Retired.[*]

McCLINTOCK, Justice.

Jim Edward Dixon was tried and orally convicted in the municipal court of the City of Worland of driving while under the influence of liquor. He appealed to the district court of Washakie County and the district judge addressed a letter to the parties…

Also in this document: Dissent · Raper; Dissent · Rose.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. EmersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Downs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hahn v. Citizens State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Elmer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API