Legal Opinion
United States v. Hinton
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 20, 2000No. 00-125(JBS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge:
According to the government, defendant Haywood Hinton, a/k/a “Ameer Hasan,” committed one violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344 and 2 when he knowingly and wilfully executed and attempted to execute a single scheme to defraud six separate financial institutions, and to obtain money, funds and assets owned by and under the control of such financial institutions, by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises. Presently before the Court are Hinton’s motions to dismiss the indictment as duplicitous and also for a bill of particulars…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Larry Starks, in No. 74-1966 Appeal of Alonzo Robinson, in No. 74-1947. Appeal of Donald Everett Abney, in No. 74-1967Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Goldblatt, Lynn DavidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. David Bruun and Ronald BerkovitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. MermelsteinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- United States v. RigasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- U.S. v. HughesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001
- United States v. WillisDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007