Legal Opinion

United States v. Rigas

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 11, 2003No. 02 CR. 1236(LBS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAND, District Judge.

Defendants John Rigas, Timothy Rigas, Michael Rigas, and Michael Mulcahey (“Defendants”) make multiple motions attacking the sufficiency of the indictment in this case (“Indictment”). Michael Rigas and John Rigas also move for an order severing their trials from that of their codefendants. For the reasons set forth below, the motions are denied.

BACKGROUND

The Indictment charges Defendants with one count of conspiracy and 22 counts of securities fraud, wire fraud, and bank fraud in connection with the control and management of the Adelphia Communications…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. O'HaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. RegensbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  2. United States v. TuzmanDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API