Durant v. Goss
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Section 724 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 1469) provides that, “in the trial of actions at law, the courts of the United States may, on motion and due notice thereof, require the parties to produce books or writings in their possession or power, winch contain evidence pertinent to the issue, in cases and under circumstances where they might be compelled to produce the same by the ordinary rules of proceeding in chancery.” The purpose of this provision is to provide a substitute for discovery in aid of a legal action. Carpenter v. Winn, 221 U. S.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carpenter v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. Bitter Root Development Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- General Film Co. v. SamplinerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Rindskopf v. PlattoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1886
- Scotten v. RosenblumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baush MacH. Tool Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Keith v. Endicott Johnson Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- C. F. Simonin's Sons, Inc. v. American Can Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1930
- Wheeling Steel Corp. v. American Rolling Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936