Legal Opinion
Houston Electric Co. v. Potter
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 17, 1931No. 9622PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLane, J.
In view of the fact that the plaintiffs are not on this appeal contesting the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant Earl Zy-licz, we deem the following statement of the nature and result of the suit sufficient for the purpose of disposing of this appeal:
This suit was instituted by the filing of a petition in the 113th district court of Harris county, Tex., wherein it is recited that “plaintiffs, Verna Alice Potter, joined pro forma herein by her husband, W. D. Potter,” were bringing suit against Houston Electric Company and Earl T. Zylicz.
It is alleged that “plaintiff, Verna Alice…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Arnold v. LeonardTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. BooneTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Missouri Pacifio Railway Co. v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Emberlin v. Wichita Falls, R. & Ft. W. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Teague v. FairchildTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Williams v. RodockerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- A. B. C. Storage & Moving Co. v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Wade v. WadeTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Ford Motor Co. v. WhittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.